SOME PROBLEMS WITH TRANSITION THEORY

SOME PROBLEMS WITH TRANSITION THEORY

Authors

  • César Cansino Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15174/remap.v13i26.435

Keywords:

Transition, Democratic Transition, Democracy, Democratization, Democratic Consolidation

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to review in the long term the theory of transitions to propose some adjustments in it that allow it to overcome several inconsistencies that afflict it from its first developments. Thus, for example, a) when it consider that the actors of change are always the political elites, both of the old regime and the emerging one, to the detriment of social actors and society in general, sins of reductionist; b) it is a very rigid and closed theory in its options, so it underestimates or omits other possible defeats and outcomes; and c) it has become a highly normative view of regime change, insensitive to factors and circumstances not contemplated by the theory, but not irrelevant.

 

References

AAlmond, G.A, S.C., Flanagan & R.J., Mundt (1973). Crisis, Choice and Change.

Little Brown & Co.

Almond, G.A., & Powell, G.B. Jr. (1978). Comparative Politics. System, Process,

and Policy. Little Brown and Company.

Cansino, C. & Covarrubias, I. (2006), “Estudio preliminar”. En Morlino, L.

Democracias y democratizaciones (pp. 9-21). CEPCOM.

Dahl, R.A. (1971), Poliarchy. Participation and Opposition. Yale University Press.

Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper & Row.

Díaz Montiel, A. & Cansino, C. (2016). “Transitología”. En Sánchez Galicia, J.

(coord.) y Cansino, C. (ed.). Treinta claves para entender el poder. Léxico para

la nueva comunicación política (Vol. I, pp. 321-334). México: Piso 15/ICP/

BUAP/CEPCOM.

Easton, D. (1953). The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political

Science. New York: Knopf.

Giner, S. (1985). Change for Continuity. [Documento para el European University

Institute, noviembre].

Huntington, S.P. (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale

University Press.

Huntington, S.P. (1991). The Third Wave. Democratization in the Late Twentieth

Century. Norman-Londres: University of Oklahoma Press.

Linz, J. (1978). “Crisis, Breakdown and Reequilibration”. En Linz, J. & Stepan,

A. (eds.). The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins

University Press.

Linz, J. (1986). “Il fattore tempo nei mutamenti di regime”. Teoria Politica, (1), pp.

-48.

Linz, J. & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and

Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and PostCommunist

Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Linz, J. & Stepan, A. (eds.) (1978). The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes.

Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Lipset, S. M. (1950). Agrarian Socialism. The Cooperative Commonwealth

Federation in Saskatchewan. A Study in Political Sociology. Berkeley:

University of California Press.

Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political Man. The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City,

Nueva York: Doubleday & Company, Inc.

Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). “Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter

alignments: An introduction”. En Party systems and voter alignments: Crossnational

perspectives (pp. 1-64). Free Press.

Morlino, L. (1980). Come cambiano i regimi politici? Milán: Franco Angeli.

Morlino, L. (2006). Democracias y democratizaciones. México: CEPCOM.

O’Donnell, G. (1973). Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism; Studies

in South American Politics. Los Angeles: University of California.

O’Donnell, G., & Schmitter, P.S. (1986). “Transition from Authoritarian Rule.

Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies”. En O’Donnell, G.,

Schmitter, P.S., & Whitehead, L. (eds.), Transitions from Authoritarian Rule

(Vol. 4, pp. 1-81). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

O’Donnell, G., Schmitter, P.S. & Whitehead, L. (eds.) (1986). Transition from

Authoritarian Rule. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

Przeworski, A. (1986). “Some Problems in the Study of the Transitions to

Democracy”. En O’Donnell, G., Schmitter, P.S. & Whitehead, L. (eds.) (1986),

Transition from Authoritarian Rule (vol. 3). Baltimore: The John Hopkins

University Press.

Przeworski, A. (2000). Capitalismo y socialdemocracia. México: Alianza.

Rustow, D.A. (1970). “Transition to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model”.

Comparative Politics, (2), pp. 337-363.

Rustow, D.A. & Erickson, K.P. (1990). Comparative Political Dynamics. Global

Research Perspectives. Nueva York: Harper Collins.

Santamaría, J. (ed.) (1982). Transición a la democracia en el sur de Europa y

América Latina. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1996). Capitalismo, socialismo y democracia (Vol. I). Ediciones

Folio. (Trabajo original publicado en 1942).

Stepan, A. (1986). “Paths toward Redemocratization: Theoretical and

Comparative Considerations”. En O’Donnell, G., Schmitter, P.S &

Whitehead, L. (eds.) (1986).

Weber, M. (1922). Economía y Sociedad: Esbozo de Sociología Comprensiva

[Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie].

Tubinga, Alemania: Mohr Siebeck.

Published

2024-12-18

How to Cite

Cansino, C. (2024). SOME PROBLEMS WITH TRANSITION THEORY. Revista Mexicana De Análisis Político Y Administración Pública, 13(26), 11–41. https://doi.org/10.15174/remap.v13i26.435
Loading...